Based Lane Starter

What this page explains#

A based lane starter walks from lane design to ordering observation and settlement evidence. This page sits in SilverScript, vProgs, And Based Apps. It gives the topic a plain-language handle first, then shows the working idea, the mechanism, the source trail, and any limits that still matter. This category distinguishes tooling convenience from protocol behavior. SilverScript can author or lower scripts, vProgs can organize based-app execution, and settlement/indexer responsibilities remain part of the application design.

The writing follows a simple Kaspa documentation pattern: answer the practical question first, then link outward for details. The closest public sources for this page are DOC-TOCCATA-BASED-APPS, KIP-0021, TOOL-VPROGS-ARCH. Local notes can help choose what to explain, but public-facing references resolve to upstream websites, repositories, papers, release pages, or docs.

How to think about it#

The practical model starts by naming the layer that owns the topic: wallet use, node operation, consensus, transaction validation, Toccata script behavior, tooling, or research. From there, the page shows which public source can support the explanation and where the explanation becomes incomplete.

For Based Lane Starter, the model is built around these anchors: choose lane namespace and payload schema; submit user operations with preserved fields; observe accepted ordering evidence; prepare settlement proof inputs; record recovery and replay assumptions. This model is useful, but it does not encode every constant, branch, error type, or edge case. Those details belong in the source path and the source notes.

How it works#

1. choose lane namespace and payload schema. Toccata-era transaction fields are application surfaces, so the guide must trace them through structs, serialization, hashing, signing, RPC, wallet tooling, mempool policy, and accepted evidence. The risk is not only invalid construction; it is a tool silently dropping or misunderstanding a field that the application relies on.

2. submit user operations with preserved fields. vProgs and settlement pages are application-architecture pages. They have to say who observes ordered activity, who computes state, who produces proofs or attestations, who submits settlement, and how restart or replay recovers evidence. That responsibility map is as important as the success path.

3. observe accepted ordering evidence. vProgs and settlement pages are application-architecture pages. They have to say who observes ordered activity, who computes state, who produces proofs or attestations, who submits settlement, and how restart or replay recovers evidence. That responsibility map is as important as the success path.

4. prepare settlement proof inputs. vProgs and settlement pages are application-architecture pages. They have to say who observes ordered activity, who computes state, who produces proofs or attestations, who submits settlement, and how restart or replay recovers evidence. That responsibility map is as important as the success path.

5. record recovery and replay assumptions. vProgs and settlement pages are application-architecture pages. They have to say who observes ordered activity, who computes state, who produces proofs or attestations, who submits settlement, and how restart or replay recovers evidence. That responsibility map is as important as the success path.

This mechanism section separates authoring tools, runtime organization, proof workflow, indexer replay, and L1 settlement. Tooling convenience does not become protocol behavior without upstream source support.

How to check it#

When using this page for tooling or based-app work, identify which layer authors scripts, observes ordering, computes state, produces proof material, submits settlement, and recovers after restart. Tool output and runtime architecture need L1 source or settlement evidence before they become protocol claims.

Related Pages#

• user-ops-payloads-and-lanes
• silverscript-vprogs-based-apps
• vprogs-architecture